A reading of Skin in the Game-Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life (2018)
Book Name:
Skin in the Game-Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life (2018)
Author:
Nassim Nicholas Taleb
This book is from the author of The Black Swans which was termed as one of the 12 most influential
books since World War II by The Sunday Times. My expectations from this book
were already very high because of his previous book which impressed me a lot. Especially
the idea that only few extreme events/things which are insignificant,
numerically and statistically, can make a gigantic effect on the world, life and
systems, appealed to me. To bring this point home Professor Taleb borrowed
examples from various fields of life including science, technology, history,
finance, economics etc. The variety of his examples made a boring subject like
statistics an interesting reading for everyone. The present book is also linked
with the idea of Black Swans. The central idea in this book, as the name itself
suggests, is that systems work efficiently when the actors have their skin in
the game. Decisions which have far reaching implications taken by persons who
don't have to face the negative consequences of those decisions are a ready
recipe for disaster and crisis. This idea of Professor Taleb can be implemented
in every field of life including politics, religion, and finance. In his
standard pungent critical style, he advices the readers "Don't take advice
from someone who gives advice for a living, unless there is a penalty for their
advice". This advice stems from his central idea that risk takers should
be taken seriously not the charlatans without their skin in the game.
He spares no one from his stark criticism especially
policy makers, corporate executives, theoreticians, bankers, and journalists
are the main targets of his bitter provocative criticism. The source of all
vices of our present day world can be traced in the divorce between decisions
and real risk. Those who are taking the real risk in their life are the one who
command respect in Taleb's world. All others who don't take risk like the
"Fat Tony" who decides to bomb Iraq to bring democracy without having
to bear the cost of this decision, the banker who lends to crony capitalists knowing
that if the loans would go bad the government
would bail out them, the
forecaster who doesn't have to lose anything if his prediction goes wrong, the
consultant who charges hefty fees but can't be held responsible if the outcomes
are not satisfactory, are among the persons who are behind the current mess in
the world. On the other hand, he is all
praise for those who take risks and sometimes fail also like entrepreneurs,
hedge fund managers, artisans, lab experimenters, and political activists. In his words, all these people have skin in
the game.
Throughout the book he keeps questioning the very
nature and credibility of the knowledge itself. Perhaps this has to do
something with him being a keen researcher of epistemology. He keeps teasing
and provoking the torch bearers of present day knowledge and research including
Nobel laureates who according to him take their knowledge "too
seriously". His main angst against them stems from the fact that they are
not "risk takers" but are running the show in the world. In his world,
an academician who makes a forecast does not have skin in the game and a
speculator who risks his money in the derivatives market has skin in the game.
So according to him in matters of risk and trading the words and advice of the
speculator is more reliable than that of the academicians. He also coined a new
term for intellectuals who can fake discussions on topics such as evolution,
neuroscience, cognitive bias, quantum mechanics, and never curse on social
media, talk about “equality of races” and “income inequality” but never drink
with the cab drivers, attend TED talks, Intellectual-Yet-Idiot (IYI). These
intellectual yet idiots have no real skin in the game.
His book is full
of aphorisms which are defiantly quotable quotes. Some of the quotations are:
On the futility
of debate:
“You will never convince someone that he is
wrong; only reality can.”
On the absence
of accountability of the bureaucrats:
“Bureaucracy is a construction by which a
person is conveniently separated from the consequences of his or her actions.”
On the perils of
centralization:
“Decentralization is based on the simple
notion that it is easier to macrobull***t than microbull***t.”
On taking advice
from someone:
“Don’t
tell me what you “think” just tell me what’s in your portfolio”
On the
functioning of the market:
“Under
the right market structure, a collection of idiots produces a well-functioning
market”
On the true
independence of a person:
“Someone
who has been employed for a while is giving you strong evidence of submission”
On how intellect
looks like:
“True intellect
should not appear to be intellectual”
On how seriously
one should take the criticism of peers:
“Contemporary
peers are valuable collaborators, not final judges” and many more.
Taleb has a
piece of advice for everyone. You are a doctor, lawyer, businessman,
entrepreneur, carpenter, electrician, academician, trader, investor,
researcher, scientist, motivational speaker, social worker, agriculturist,
villager, corporate executive; there is something Professor Taleb has to impart
to you in this book. The notion of risk elaborated by him in this book makes
the epistemologists, statisticians, mathematicians and philosophers envious as
he made it easily comprehensible, readable, and enjoyable as well as thought
provoking at the same time. Compared to his past works “The Black Swans”,
“Antifragility”, and “Fooled by Randomness”, I found this book to be more
readable and enjoyable. If you are looking for a book which can deepen your
understanding of the world then perhaps this book should be your next reading
target. If you are looking to sharpen your skills to differentiate between
bullshit and knowledge, charlatans and serious scholars, this book will
certainly enhance your bullshit detection skills.
Comments
Post a Comment