Equity Risk Premium in India

The empirical regularity that stocks provide a higher return than government bonds is known as “equity premium” puzzle, a term first coined by Mehra and Prescott (1985). The most intuitive answer that stocks are riskier than Bonds is not a sufficient explanation for this observed puzzle. Moreover, this equity risk premium (ERP) epitomizes the investor risk aversion. A person if given a choice between a low but sure payoff and a high but uncertain payoff would choose the guaranteed payoff if he is risk-averse. Given the expected utility of both the scenarios are same, a risk-neutral person would be indifferent between the choices.
However, the presence of equity risk premium (ERP) exemplifies that investors are largely risk-averse. Because arbitrage by investors should have eliminated (or reduced) the return difference between these two investment opportunities which is not the case in the present case.

Table-Equity Risk Premium in India 2000-2016
Year
BSE500
Yield on 10 Year Govt. Bond
Premium
2000
-27.17%
11.04%
-38.22%
2001
-22.91%
9.37%
-32.28%
2002
16.99%
7.20%
9.80%
2003
101.10%
5.60%
95.49%
2004
17.47%
5.93%
11.53%
2005
36.56%
6.97%
29.59%
2006
38.85%
7.66%
31.19%
2007
63.02%
7.95%
55.07%
2008
-58.14%
7.85%
-65.99%
2009
90.23%
6.95%
83.28%
2010
16.35%
7.85%
8.50%
2011
-27.41%
8.37%
-35.78%
2012
31.20%
8.30%
22.90%
2013
3.25%
8.20%
-4.95%
2014
36.96%
8.56%
28.40%
2015
-0.82%
7.75%
-8.57%
2016
3.78%
7.18%
-3.39%
Mean
18.78%
7.81%
10.98%


This table shows annual returns of S&P BSE 500 index during 2000-2016 and the average yield on 10-year government bond obtained from Investing.com. 10 out of last 17 years have provided a positive equity premium.  On the other hand, the equity premium is negative in rest of the 7 years. However, on an average, the risk premium is 10.98% during the sample period. I would like to add a caveat here that it is very easy to fall victim to the fallacy of average, as the standard deviation of the ERP is 42.4%, which is quite high. 
As Nassim Nicholas Taleb puts it very eloquently: "Don't cross a river if it is four feet deep on average". Although the ERP is 10.98% on average during the last 17 years, there is a lot of volatility in it. For example. in 2008 (which is the period of the financial crisis), the ERP is -65% or an investor who was expecting a return of 10.98% above the risk-free rate may have ended up eroding his investment by 65%. Or take the example of the latest two years. Both in 2015 and 2016 the ERP is negative. Therefore, investors would have been better off if they would have invested in Govt. Bonds instead of equity market in these two years. But again this statement is true only ON AVERAGE. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Simple or Log Returns?

Image
One thing that puzzles many in quantitative finance is when log return is appropriate and when simple return should be used. Simple Return Formula:                    Log Return Formula:                           While there are several benefits of using log returns like log-normality, time additiveness, approximate raw-log equality and mathematical ease, a common fallacy is to use is at places where it is not appropriate. The most important difference between simple and log returns is the features of time-additivity and asset-Additivity. Simple returns are asset-additive : Portfolio return is the weighted average of the stocks in the portfolio.  where weights are the proportion of an individual stock in the portfolio and the sum of the weights is 1. Therefore, if an investor puts an equal amount of money in each stock it will be called “equally-weighted” portfolio. The return of an equally-weighted portfolio is just the average return of all stocks in t
Read more

Islamic Principles of Equity Investing

 Islamic principles of equity investing Just like other matters, people do ifrat (immoderation) and Tafreet (negligence) and avoid I’tedal and iqtesad (moderation, middle way) in equity investing also. On one hand, there exists a tribe that is indifferent to the Shariah’ guidelines and indulges in all kinds of transactions without delving into its permissibility. On the other hand, some see too many Shariah issues and consider it better to avoid them. Such is the importance of moderation Quran says about the immoderation of the previous communities in the following words: وَلَوۡ اَنَّهُمۡ اَقَامُوا التَّوۡرٰٮةَ وَالۡاِنۡجِيۡلَ وَمَاۤ اُنۡزِلَ اِلَيۡهِمۡ مِّنۡ رَّبِّهِمۡ لَاَ كَلُوۡا مِنۡ فَوۡقِهِمۡ وَمِنۡ تَحۡتِ اَرۡجُلِهِمۡ‌ؕ مِنۡهُمۡ اُمَّةٌ مُّقۡتَصِدَةٌ‌  ؕ وَكَثِيۡرٌ مِّنۡهُمۡ سَآءَ مَا يَعۡمَلُوۡنَ “If they had observed the Torah and the Gospel and that which was revealed unto them from their Lord, they would surely have been nourished from above them and from beneath their feet
Read more

Some observations on smallcases

The smallcases entice many investors due to ease of investment, delight factor, and continuous monitoring. However, it may not be suitable to many investors if used incorrectly. And in many cases, there is mis-selling too. The following considerations are important while subscribing to any smallcase: Subscription fee : Currently, most of the smallcases offer subscriptions on a fixed-cost basis that ranges between ₹3000 to ₹18000 annually charged monthly or quarterly. Let us assume that your investment capital is ₹50000, and you have subscribed to a smallcase charging ₹12000 pa. This amounts to a humongous expense ratio of 24%. Typically a mutual fund has an expense ratio of 0.5-1.5%. It also means that the smallcase has to provide a 24% CAGR to break even, which is quite difficult. Therefore, the takeaway is that unless your capital is large, subscribing to smallcases doesn’t make sense . If a typical smallcase charges ₹12000 pa, then a capital of ₹1000000 would result in an expens
Read more